A) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was subjectively joking.
B) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was joking and a reasonable person should have known that.
C) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because the parties had been consuming alcohol.
D) The court ruled that the agreement would be enforced because of the outward manifestations of agreement.
E) The court ruled that the contract would be enforced because of what the parties said,regardless of whether an objective person would have thought joking was involved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Contracts entered into as a result of fraud.
B) Contracts entered into as a result of duress.
C) Contracts entered into as a result of undue influence.
D) Contracts entered into as a result of fraud or duress,but not undue influence.
E) Contracts entered into as a result of fraud,duress,or undue influence.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied
B) Express
C) Quasi-
D) Illusory
E) Implied-in-law
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Brenda is correct.There was no contract because she had not started working.
B) Brenda is incorrect because there was a bilateral,express agreement.
C) Brenda is incorrect because there was a bilateral,implied agreement.
D) Brenda is incorrect because there was a unilateral,express agreement.
E) Brenda is incorrect because there was a unilateral,implied agreement.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the doctrine of mutual exclusivity
B) the equal dignities rule
C) the mirror-image rule
D) a unilateral promise
E) an invitation to negotiate
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) immediately terminates
B) applies to other similar property owned by the offeror
C) becomes the subject of an option contract
D) is voidable
E) is still subject to acceptance by the offeree unless the offeror revokes the offer before the offeree accepts it
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because it involved a luxury good.
B) The court ruled that the advertisement was an offer but that the customer who was suing had not properly accepted it.
C) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because it was a ridiculously low offer that the plaintiff should have known was not to be taken seriously.
D) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because advertisements are never offers; instead,they are merely invitations for customers to make an offer.
E) The court ruled that the advertisement was an offer and that the plaintiff properly accepted it.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There is no contract because silence,as a general rule,cannot be used to form a contract.
B) There is no contract because the offer was not made in person.
C) There is no contract because the offer was not made in writing.
D) Janice can avoid the legal recognition of a contract,but only if she can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she did not hear about the offer before the stated expiration time.
E) Janice can avoid the legal recognition of a contract,but only if she can prove beyond reasonable doubt that she did not hear about the offer before the stated expiration time.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Case law and the Restatement (Second) of Contracts.
B) Case law and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) .
C) The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and the Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) .
D) Case law and the Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) .
E) The Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) and the Restatement (Second) of Contracts.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) unilateral; equilateral
B) equilateral; trilateral
C) bilateral; trilateral
D) unilateral; bilateral
E) bilateral; equilateral
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Forty-eight hours
B) Three business days
C) Seven calendar days
D) Thirty calendar days
E) There is no set amount of time; instead,what constitutes a reasonable amount of time varies depending upon the subject matter of the offer.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The substantial performance doctrine.
B) The contract integrity rule.
C) The mirror-image rule.
D) The mailbox rule.
E) The contract legality rule.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Barry will win because when an auction is held without reserve,the auctioneer is entitled to repossess any item at will.
B) Barry will lose,but only because he was not the actual seller.He was only selling at auction for someone else.The seller,however,would win in an action against Helen.
C) Barry would win because Helen made an insufficient offer.
D) Helen will win,but only if she can show that Barry had knowledge that cash was in the drawer before he sold it.
E) Helen will win because the auction was without reserve and she properly bid on and bought the cash register with everyone knowing that the cash drawer was stuck.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) legal object
B) agreement
C) coherence
D) alliance
E) concurrence
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The International Contracts Code
B) The International Commercial Code
C) The Uniform Contracts Code
D) The Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
E) The Convention for the Global Standardization of Commercial Trade and Contract Law
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 81 - 100 of 119
Related Exams